Analisis Hukum Dugaan Peniruan Merek Polo Terhadap Ralph Lauren Di Indonesia
Kata Kunci:
Famous Brands, Legal Protection, Similarities On Subject, Likelihood Of Confusion, Ralph Lauren.Abstrak
Legal Analysis of the Alleged Imitation of the Polo Brand against Ralph Lauren in Indonesia
The protection of well-known brands is becoming one of the important issues in intellectual property law as trademark disputes increase in global trade. One of the disputes that has attracted attention is the use of the POLO brand which has sparked debates regarding the protection of well-known brands, similarities in essence, and potential consumer confusion. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of well-known brands and examine the alleged similarities between the POLO and Ralph Lauren brands based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The research uses normative legal methods with legislative, conceptual, and case approaches. Data was obtained through literature studies sourced from laws and regulations, international legal instruments, books, scientific journals, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study show that Ralph Lauren meets the criteria as a well-known brand that obtains protection under national and international law. The analysis also shows that the use of the word "POLO" and symbols related to the sport of polo has the potential to cause similarities in the subject matter as well as the likelihood of confusion regarding the origin or affiliation of the product. Therefore, the protection of well-known brands is necessary to ensure legal certainty, protect consumers, and create healthy business competition.
Referensi
Atmoko, D. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Merek Terkenal dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional dan Perjanjian TRIPs. Jurnal Hukum dan Kekayaan Intelektual, 12(1), 75-86.
Azis, R. Z. A. C., & Hermono, B. (2024). Analisis yuridis putusan hakim bagi pemegang merek dagang Polo Ralph Lauren di Indonesia (Putusan Nomor 614 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023). Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 11(2), 326–338.
Azwar, M. (2023). Sengketa merek dagang MS Glow dan PS Glow atas merek dalam perspektif hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 7(2), 143–153.
Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2021). Hak milik intelektual: Sejarah, teori, dan praktiknya di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Mapping global trade in fakes 2025: Global trends and enforcement challenges. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Hadiyati, N. (2023). Analisis Likelihood of Confusion dan Passing Off dalam Sengketa Merek Dagang Internasional di Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 15(2), 291-300.
Harahap, M. Y. (2021). Hukum acara perdata tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Jened, R. (2021). Hukum merek (Trademark law) dalam era global dan integrasi ekonomi (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.
Lobo, L. P., & Wauran, I. (2021). Kedudukan istimewa merek terkenal (asing) dalam hukum merek Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(1), 70–83.
Mahendra, A. (2024). Doktrin Goodwill dan Batasan Penggunaan Istilah Umum (Generic Words) dalam Sengketa Merek Sektor Fesyen. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 11(2), 1-11.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Putusan Nomor 614 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023 dalam Perkara Sengketa Merek antara Mohindar H.B. melawan PT Manggala Putra Perkasa dan PT Polo Ralph Lauren Indonesia. Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.
McCarthy, J. T. (2023). McCarthy on trademarks and unfair competition (6th ed.). St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters.
Moha, A. P., Lie, G., & Syailendra, M. R. (2024). Perlindungan hukum penggunaan hak atas merek Pierre Cardin (Studi kasus Putusan No.15/Pdt.Sus.Merek/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humaniora dan Politik, 4(5), 1280–1289.
Muzakki, M. A., Roisah, K., & Prananda, R. R. (2018). Legal political of well-known trademark protection reviewed from development of trademark law in Indonesia to avoid fraudulent competition. Law Reform, 14(2), 176–190.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), & European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). (2025). Global Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact and High-Brand-Intensive Industries Trends. OECD Publishing.
Saidin, O. K. (2021). Aspek hukum hak kekayaan intelektual (Intellectual property rights) (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Saputra, B., & Handoko, W. (2023). Perlindungan hukum merek terkenal yang didaftarkan (Studi kasus Putusan Nomor: 206/G/2020/PTUN.JKT). Notarius, 16(1), 195–210.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sudaryat. (2020). Hak kekayaan intelektual: Memahami prinsip dasar, cakupan, dan regulasinya. Bandung: Oase Media.
Tim Peneliti Hukum KKI. (2024). Bagan Alur Konseptual Dimensi Hukum Nasional (UU Merek) dan Dimensi Hukum Internasional (TRIPs) dalam Kasus POLO vs Ralph Lauren [Bagan Alur Penelitian]. Laboratorium Hukum Kedeputian Kekayaan Intelektual.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. (2016). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 252. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Usman, R. (2022). Hukum hak atas kekayaan intelektual: Perlindungan dan dimensi hukumnya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs Agreement). Marrakesh: World Trade Organization.
Yanti, N., & Marpaung, D. S. H. (2022). Penyelesaian sengketa merek PS Glow melawan MS Glow berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang arbitrase dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(18), 540–550
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
