Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Buddha Jenjang SMA Berbasis Kontekstual Dan Hots Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Dengan Pendekatan Metode Pilihan Ganda Kompleks

Penulis

  • Leo Nando Sastro Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Sobani Sobani Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Shintia Greshia Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Yani Relita Sulandari Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Juwita Ratna Dewi Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Ryan Gautama Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Kemanya Karbono Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia
  • Puji Sulani Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Sriwijaya, Tangerang Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i02.148

Kata Kunci:

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS); Rasch Model; Spiritual Attitude Assessment

Abstrak

DEVELOPMENT OF A CONTEXTUAL AND HOTS-BASED EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR BUDDHIST RELIGIOUS EDUCATION LEARNING AT HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL IN THE INDEPENDENT CURRICULUM WITH A COMPLEX MULTIPLE CHOICE METHOD APPROACH

AbstractThis study aimed to develop and validate a contextual Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-based evaluation instrument using complex multiple-choice items to measure the spiritual attitudes of Grade XI students in Buddhist Education under the Merdeka Curriculum. The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model involving 45 students and expert validators. Instrument quality was evaluated using the Rasch model, including reliability, construct validity, dimensionality, item fit, and Differential Item Functioning (DIF). The results demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, with person reliability of 0.77, item reliability of 0.98, and overall reliability of 0.89. Construct validity was confirmed through a Raw Variance Explained of 77.2%, while only one item exhibited gender bias. The developed instrument effectively measures higher-order thinking at the analysis and evaluation levels within authentic learning contexts and is suitable for assessing students' spiritual attitudes in Buddhist Education.

Referensi

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. New York: Longman.

Cahyadi, R. A. H. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis ADDIE. Jurnal Pendidikan.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

Branch, R. M. (2020). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach.

Buddharakkhita, A. (1985). The Dhammapada: The Buddha’s Path of Wisdom. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.

Benjamin D. Wright & Geofferey N. Masters (1982). Rating Scale Analysis (RASCH Measurement), Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.

Emmons, R. A. (2000). Spirituality and intelligence: Problems and prospects. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 57–64.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

Haryanto. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 85–94.

Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PYSTHOT). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12.

Larry R. Price (2017). Psychometric Methods (Theory into Practice), London: The Guilford Press.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Matilde Bini, Paola Monari, Domenico Piccolo & Luigi Salmaso (2009). Statistical Methods for The Evaluation of Educational Service and Quality of Products, Italy: Physica-Verlag (A Springer Company).

Narada Thera. (1998). The Buddha and His Teachings. Kuala Lumpur: Buddhist Missionary Society.

Nyanaponika Thera. (1962). The heart of Buddhist meditation. London: Rider & Company.

Rahula, W. (1974). What the Buddha taught. New York: Grove Press.

Retnawati, H., et al. (2018). Teachers’ Knowledge about HOTS. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230.

Setiawan, A., et al. (2020). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Setiawan, A., et al. (2021). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan.

Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryani, N. (2020). Pembelajaran Berbasis Budaya dalam Meningkatkan Karakter Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 45–56.

Widana, I. W. (2017). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment (HOTS). Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 150–160.

Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (2000). Spiritual intelligence: The ultimate intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.

Diterbitkan

2026-07-17

Cara Mengutip

Sastro , L. N. ., Sobani, S., Greshia , S. ., Sulandari , Y. R. ., Dewi , J. R. ., Gautama , R. ., Karbono , K. ., & Sulani , P. . (2026). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Buddha Jenjang SMA Berbasis Kontekstual Dan Hots Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Dengan Pendekatan Metode Pilihan Ganda Kompleks. JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN, 14(02), 1819–1830. https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i02.148