Kondisi Isyarat Konten Informasi Digital Internasional: Persepsi Otonomi Dan Kompetensi Situasional, Motivasi Intrinsik Situasional

Authors

  • Filsha O. Hendri Putri Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Eka Sudarmaji Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i01.12

Keywords:

Cognitive Evaluation Theory; nontransactional digital consumption; situational intrinsic motivation; parallel mediation

Abstract

Cue Conditions in International Digital Information Content: Situational Perceptions of Autonomy and Competence, and Situational Intrinsic Motivation

This study examined the evaluative mechanism of Cognitive Evaluation Theory (CET) in nontransactional consumption of international digital information content by positioning the cue condition as an external event and situational autonomy and competence perceptions as parallel mediators of situational intrinsic motivation. A quantitative experiment with a randomized between-subjects design involved 120 adult consumers in DKI Jakarta, randomly assigned to informational or controlling conditions, with 60 participants per condition. The stimulus consisted of The Guardian content concerning exoplanet HD 137010 b, with cue framing experimentally varied across conditions. The manipulation check indicated that the controlling condition was perceived as more controlling than the informational condition. PLS-SEM with 5,000 bootstrap subsamples showed significant paths from the condition to situational autonomy perception (β = 1.158) and situational competence perception (β = 1.239), but both paths were positive and therefore did not support the hypothesized negative directions of H1 and H2. Situational autonomy perception (β = 0.362) and situational competence perception (β = 0.570) were positively and significantly associated with situational intrinsic motivation. Both specific indirect effects were also significant. Reliability and convergent validity evidence was strong, whereas HTMT indicated substantial construct overlap that limits an unequivocal claim of discriminant validity. The findings provide selective support for the evaluative structure of CET while revealing an empirical divergence from its hypothesized directional pattern for the treatment-to-evaluation paths.

References

Adachi, P. J. C., Ryan, R. M., Frye, J., McClurg, D., & Rigby, C. S. (2018). “I can’t wait for the next episode!” Investigating the motivational pull of television dramas through the lens of self-determination theory. Motivation Science, 4(1), 78–94. doi:10.1037/mot0000063

Alferes, V. R. (2012). Methods of randomization in experimental design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781452270012

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

de Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115. doi:10.1037/h0030644

Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 113–120. doi:10.1037/h0032355

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–80). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60130-6

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

Efendioğlu, İ. H. (2024). Digital consumer behavior: A systematic literature review. Prizren Social Science Journal, 8(1), 67–80. doi:10.32936/pssj.v8i1.479

Enzle, M. E., & Anderson, S. C. (1993). Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 257–266. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.257

Errmann, A., & Arango, L. (2025). When suffering hurts more: Suffering for material products reduces intrinsic motivation, well-being, and repurchase intention compared to experiences. Journal of Business Research, 199, 115506. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115506

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Heeringa, S. G., West, B. T., & Berglund, P. A. (2017). Applied survey data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Hsu, C.-L. (2022). Applying cognitive evaluation theory to analyze the impact of gamification mechanics on user engagement in resource recycling. Information & Management, 59(2), 103602. doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103602

Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kirk, R. E. (2013). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781483384733

Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling versus informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52(3), 233–248. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00879.x

Lohr, S. L. (2022). Sampling: Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Maxwell, S. E., Delaney, H. D., & Kelley, K. (2017). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315642956

Mazzocchi, M. (2008). Statistics for marketing and consumer research. London, England: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9780857024657

Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Design and analysis of experiments (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Newman, N., Ross Arguedas, A., Robertson, C. T., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2025). Digital news report 2025. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. doi:10.60625/risj-8qqf-jt36

Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical research: Design and process (13th global ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Pittman, T. S., Davey, M. E., Alafat, K. A., Wetherill, K. V., & Kramer, N. A. (1980). Informational versus controlling verbal rewards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(2), 228–233. doi:10.1177/014616728062007

Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 450–461. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450

Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 736–750. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.736

Sağkaya Güngör, A. S., & Ozansoy Çadırcı, T. O. (2022). Understanding digital consumer: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1829–1858. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12809

Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6(1), 94–102. doi:10.1123/jsp.6.1.94

Viglia, G., Zaefarian, G., & Ulqinaku, A. (2021). How to design good experiments in marketing: Types, examples, and methods. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 193–206. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.08.007

Weinstein, N., Zougkou, K., & Paulmann, S. (2018). You ‘have’ to hear this: Using tone of voice to motivate others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 898–913. doi:10.1037/xhp0000502

Weinstein, N., Vansteenkiste, M., & Paulmann, S. (2020). Don’t you say it that way! Experimental evidence that controlling voices elicit defiance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, 103949. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103949

Downloads

Published

30-07-2026

How to Cite

Putri, F. O. H. ., & Sudarmaji, E. . (2026). Kondisi Isyarat Konten Informasi Digital Internasional: Persepsi Otonomi Dan Kompetensi Situasional, Motivasi Intrinsik Situasional. JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN, 14(01), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i01.12