Sinkronisasi Kecerdasan Buatan Dan Manajemen Berbasis Karakter Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i02.109Keywords:
artificial intelligence; character-based management; education governance; Golden Indonesia 2045Abstract
Synchronizing Artificial Intelligence and Character-Based Management toward Golden Indonesia 2045
This study analyzed the synchronization of artificial intelligence (AI) and character-based management (CBM) in transforming national education governance toward Golden Indonesia 2045. The study responded to the need for greater efficiency, accurate decision-making, and personalized learning without weakening the human values of education. A qualitative literature-review design was employed. Data were drawn from policy documents, academic books, institutional reports, and scientific articles on AI in education, character education, school governance, and digital transformation. The sources were analyzed through data reduction, thematic grouping, cross-source comparison, and conclusion drawing. The findings showed that AI could support administrative automation, adaptive learning, early identification of learning difficulties, and data-informed policy evaluation. CBM was essential for directing technology toward integrity, responsibility, fairness, empathy, and respect for learners’ dignity. Their synchronization required ethical leadership, data protection, teacher capacity building, equitable infrastructure, and meaningful human oversight. Therefore, AI should function as a decision-support instrument, while character values should determine the purpose, limitations, and accountability of its use.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Pendidikan Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: BPS.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. New York: Springer.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Dewantara, K. H. (1962). Karya Ki Hajar Dewantara: Bagian Pertama Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Taman Siswa.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Laporan Survei Penguatan Karakter Tahun 2023. Jakarta: Pusat Penguatan Karakter.
Kholis, N., Widodo, S. A., & Purnami, A. S. (2023). Analisis sentimen dalam pembelajaran berbasis proyek untuk mendeteksi perkembangan karakter siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 14(1), 45–58.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2023). Status Literasi Digital Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: Kominfo.
Lickona, T. (2012). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Samani, M., & Hariyanto. (2016). Pendidikan Karakter: Konsep dan Model. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Widodo, S. A. (2023). Beban administrasi guru dan dampaknya terhadap kualitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 56(2), 201–215.
Widodo, S. A., & Purnami, A. S. (2023). Transformasi digital pendidikan di Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(3), 178–192.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
